Exhibit
Harvest Ring stereogram
A single broad ring floats among autumn leaves — clean geometry on a warm, earthy field. Rendered live with a fixed seed.
Reveal answer
Rendered locally in your browser — nothing is downloaded from or uploaded to a server. Stuck? Open "Reveal answer" to see the depth map you are looking for, then fold it away and try again.
Hold the screen at arm's length and look through it, as if focusing on something behind the glass. The pattern will blur, double, and then snap into depth. New to this? The two-dot drill in How to View makes it much easier.
What is hidden in this image
A flat ring (annulus): a large outer circle with a smaller inner circle removed. The even-odd fill rule creates a single continuous band with a hollow centre. There are no gemstones, engravings or extra circles — just one clean band.
About the Autumn texture
Autumn scatters small elliptical leaves in gold, burnt orange, russet and pale yellow on a deep brown ground. Each leaf is slightly rotated and partially transparent, so the layers feel like fallen foliage. The warm palette and moderate density give the surface a seasonal, paper-like quality.
Why this pairing
The ring is the simplest geometric shape here after the heart — no corners, no thin parts, just a continuous band. Autumn's warm, moderate-contrast leaves let the ring read clearly without competing for attention. Depth 26 is the highest in this set; the ring's uniform width tolerates a strong shift well.
Where to look first
The outer edge of the ring usually appears first as a smooth circular ridge. Once that locks, the inner hole reveals itself as a flat disk sitting deeper than the band. The symmetry means that partial locks often resolve quickly into the full circle.
What may be hard to see
There are no hard-to-read parts — the band is uniformly wide and the edges are smooth curves. The only possible difficulty is that the high depth (26) can make the image look "thick" or exaggerated if you are used to subtler pieces; simply step back slightly if the ring seems to jump too far forward. In our editorial judgement this is an easy piece — a guideline, not a measured success rate.